Personally, I make no distinction or harbour any prejudice between all the 
forms of commercial endeavour - whether commercial products or commercial 
services, whether commercial software or ancilliary commercial services.

I make my money by offering software and ancilliary *services*. However, I 
bear no animosity towards those selling software *products*. I also do NOT 
subscribe to GNU view that the world of software should only be services 
oriented and nobody should be selling products.

As far as I know, ILUGD has already set a precedent, by allowing certain 
non-Free commercial publishers to actually *promote* their books at an 
ILUGD meeting. Ironically, that meeting was held at Sudhir's office only. 
The publisher representatives were told of offering their books through GNU 
FDL by Raj, to which they said that they would "get back on that". BTW, 
what ever happened to that? Trinity?

I believe that while commercial interests are not given primary importance 
in meets (e.g. like holding a special XYZ software ILUGD meet), giving them 
a platform from time to time to announce their wares, should not be a 
problem. We allow them a similar platform on mailing lists using the 
[COMMERCIAL] tag, don't we? We do help developers/admins at firms making 
closed source products on the list, don't we?

On the brighter side, we can get them to sponsor the eats at the meeting 
perhaps. :) (Now you know my vested interest in the topic ;)

Personally, I believe this is a Linux USER's Group. If it had been a Linux 
philosophy group, or just a GNU group, perhaps apart from me a lot of 
people would have been missing over here. We believe in promotion of Linux 
in all forms. More commercial software on Linux would mean more people 
using Linux and more people seriously searching for other apps on Linux, 
which in turn is going to be mostly OpenSource. So everybody gains.

Perhaps some people fear that Linux might be in the danger of being flooded 
with closed-source commercial goods. I don't have such a fear. If a 
commercial product is successful enough, one can be rest assured that 
someone will come up with a OpenSource alternative. Among all this, Linux 
wins because all these apps are going to be running on it! So we are all happy!

- Sandip




At 02:41 AM 8/29/2002 +0530, you wrote:
>Hello Amit,
>
>Since I was not trying to promote the software through this offer, that
>does not remain an issue at all.

--
Sandip Bhattacharya
sandipb <@> bigfoot.com
http://www.sandipb.net

          ================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in subject 
header. Check archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd%40wpaa.org

Reply via email to