On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Balachandran Sivakumar < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Balasubramaniam Natarajan > <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is just my opinion, If you corporate security policy clearly states > > that business email may be scrutinized for security reason I don't think > > that it is a bad thing to do. After all as a security admin what you care > > for is the security of your corporate network. I guess most people would > > understand. > > > > Yes, it can be scrutinized. But scrutinizing is not the same > as Bcc'ing a copy of my mail to the admin. When people say > "scrutinize", they check the mail contents against a set of > words/phrases/expressions. This is done by the software the processes > the mail and not by a human. I call it unethical when the whole mail > is Bcc'ed to some other person. Thanks > Well we have to understand that software cannot do every thing, that too especially in the security field. Say if an email contains an executable an security analyst need to check it before releasing inside their environment as a preventive measure rather than start the clean up later on. > > PS: It would be really nice if you could do interleaved posting > instead of top posting. People wouldn't know if your response was for > my mail or Girish's mail(in this case.). So, please try to avoid top > posting and do interleaved posting. > > -- > Thank you > Balachandran Sivakumar > > Arise Awake and stop not till the goal is reached. > - Swami > Vivekananda > > Mail: [email protected] > Blog: http://benignbala.wordpress.com/ > _______________________________________________ > ILUGC Mailing List: > http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc > -- Regards, Balasubramaniam Natarajan www.etutorshop.com/moodle/ _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
