Hi,
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Balasubramaniam Natarajan
<[email protected]> wrote:
> This is just my opinion, If you corporate security policy clearly states
> that business email may be scrutinized for security reason I don't think
> that it is a bad thing to do. After all as a security admin what you care
> for is the security of your corporate network. I guess most people would
> understand.
>
Yes, it can be scrutinized. But scrutinizing is not the same
as Bcc'ing a copy of my mail to the admin. When people say
"scrutinize", they check the mail contents against a set of
words/phrases/expressions. This is done by the software the processes
the mail and not by a human. I call it unethical when the whole mail
is Bcc'ed to some other person. Thanks
PS: It would be really nice if you could do interleaved posting
instead of top posting. People wouldn't know if your response was for
my mail or Girish's mail(in this case.). So, please try to avoid top
posting and do interleaved posting.
--
Thank you
Balachandran Sivakumar
Arise Awake and stop not till the goal is reached.
- Swami Vivekananda
Mail: [email protected]
Blog: http://benignbala.wordpress.com/
_______________________________________________
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
