On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Arun Khan <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Arun Khan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 7:54 AM, balaji sivanath <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> /dev/sda2            9562       60800   411576501+   f  W95 Ext'd (LBA)
>>
>> BTW, which  OS (fdisk) did you use to create the extended partition?
>
> Please answer the question and help the community learn from your
> mistakes (if any).   Name the OS and the version number.
>
> I have been using GNU/fdisk since 1995 (in a plethora of Linux
> distros)  and done *lots* of disk partitioning but never seen this
> before.
>
I have bought the old system, so i think they used windows xp and its tool.

I used system rescue cd, then used fdisk expertmode to arrange device
name sequentially. Deleted the existing two swap partitions and now i
am able to enter cfdisk. In cfdisk created new boot partition,root
partition,swap partition for my arch linux. Now using arch to send
this mail :)

Here is my current "fdisk-l" output.

Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders, total 976773168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0xae1bae1b

  Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   *          63   153597464    76798701    7  HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda2       153597589   976768064   411585238    f  W95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/sda5       153597591   255995774    51199092    7  HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda6       255995838   358394084    51199123+   7  HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda7       358394148   563190704   102398278+   7  HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda8       563191808   760956927    98882560   83  Linux
/dev/sda9       760956991   971569077   105306043+  83  Linux
/dev/sda10      971569141   971761857       96358+  83  Linux
/dev/sda11      971761921   976768064     2503072   83  Linux

> --
> Arun Khan
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> A: Top-posting.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
>

Regards,
Balaji
_______________________________________________
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc

Reply via email to