On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:03 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]>wrote:
> I don't really think there is any such classification in the real > world or at least not anything officially. What I am trying to put > forth is just a line of differentiation that would help us to see a > distinction between propertiery based languages and those languages > that are open source based. > > As for the question of classifying c/c++, why go for such a high level > language? you can take up assembly language or BASIC FORTRAN for that > matter. The reason for them to not to be placed on either side is that > they were the ones on the first placed which ushered the development > of both open source and closed sourced systems. So there is nothing > like a strict protocol that defines the distinction of languages. But > rather the distinction is meant to help you chose between PHP and ASP > or between visual studio based languages and Qt based ones. > > I hope I have justified the term "open source languages". > > On 3/2/11, Thoufi Tiger <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I think the differentiation was meant to place languages like PHP, > > Python, Perl opposite to propertiery system based languages such as > > Visual Basic, C#, . . .etc > > > > Friend ,then how these languages were developed by..though PYTHON provide > a > > high level user experience ...so by programs does they hav developed?? > yeah ... got it :) > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ILUGC Mailing List: > > http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc > > > > > -- > Regards > P.Arunmozhi > Twitter: @tecoholic > Website: http://arunmozhi.in > _______________________________________________ > ILUGC Mailing List: > http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc > -- Anuvrat Parashar 3rd Year Undergraduate, CSE ASET, Noida www.bhanuvrat.blogspot.com/p/about.html _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
