I don't really think there is any such classification in the real world or at least not anything officially. What I am trying to put forth is just a line of differentiation that would help us to see a distinction between propertiery based languages and those languages that are open source based.
As for the question of classifying c/c++, why go for such a high level language? you can take up assembly language or BASIC FORTRAN for that matter. The reason for them to not to be placed on either side is that they were the ones on the first placed which ushered the development of both open source and closed sourced systems. So there is nothing like a strict protocol that defines the distinction of languages. But rather the distinction is meant to help you chose between PHP and ASP or between visual studio based languages and Qt based ones. I hope I have justified the term "open source languages". On 3/2/11, Thoufi Tiger <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I think the differentiation was meant to place languages like PHP, > Python, Perl opposite to propertiery system based languages such as > Visual Basic, C#, . . .etc > > Friend ,then how these languages were developed by..though PYTHON provide a > high level user experience ...so by programs does they hav developed?? > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ILUGC Mailing List: > http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc > -- Regards P.Arunmozhi Twitter: @tecoholic Website: http://arunmozhi.in _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
