Greetings, On 1/27/11, murali <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > So what is the conclusion the team is suggesting me. >
1. Cut the crap of digest. It irritaates at least me and prevents me from attempting to even understand the query -- let alone analyse and resolve. 2. In Linux GUI programs have their own way of stashing away information under a plethora of hidden directories under the home directory of the user. try ls -la 3. Now if you use a tool like kickstart, puppet (esp RPM based) and the such, there *may* be possibility to specify the locations of these cache/config directory based on the application. 4. A job can be setup to caontrol carious aspects of monitoring. 5. If you dare to use APIs of popular monitoring programs, you can perhaps hook on to them for central monitoring. 6. You have not mentioned what are the hardware available on the alleged desktops for support of managment port, if any. (viz rsa, ilo etc., etc.) 6. OF course if you can consider virtualisation, open source tools like ovirt etc 7. My dearest friend, who is still wet behind ears when it comes to more than 5 desktop management, There are no canned solutions in real world for such complex requirements. That is where money is in open source. Pay to the vendor or to the service provider. Don't gobble it all by yourself. Donate to some opensource project, conduct events, Promote 8 Respect others time. they are on their volutary donation time. not on your payroll. nor or they slaves. 9. They are not your team, so cut out the appealing to the team etc. etc. HTH Regards Rajagopal _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
