On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, varadarajan narayanan wrote: > 1) NRC FOSS staff could have avoided the issue. It is like serving > mutton biriyani for poor on Gandhi jayanthi. Good intentions but > badly done.
> 2) LUGC members could have taken it in the stride - mentioned it but > not make an issue of it . > 3) NRC FOSS representatives could have accepted the slip and assured > that they will take such things. > 4) LUGC members could have avoided playing one-up on each other and > convert it to a flame war. Thanks VN :) I feel, this discussion is going away from the interest of the ILUGC. Now there is no point in fighting/discussing about the mistake, which is already happened, and asking how it happened, why, and explaining what happened, etc., This is an opportunity to understand and correct OUR mistakes. Move on... STOP. Don't reply to this thread. Bye :) -- Bharathi S _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, email ilugc-requ...@ae.iitm.ac.in with "unsubscribe <password> <address>" in the subject or body of the message. http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
