On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Raman.P <raam...@yahoo.co.in> wrote: > > --- On Tue, 3/3/09, Srinivasan Sundararajan <srini...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I disagree with Raman : simply being a volunteer > > doesn't absolve one from > > the responsibilities nor does working for an organization > > "funded by tax > > payers" (sic) thrusts a load of absolute > > responsibilities on the > > individual. > That is why I tendered apology from organising side. I never blamed > NRCFOSS, I was only pained. > But the tone from both KG and Prakash set the thread unnecessarily > personal, instead of tackling issue at large. Even now I have nothing > against any individual. It is my wish that NRCFOSS achieves its slated > objective - which is similar to that of any LUG. > > And I stop here. >
Myself interested in the following things in future: [1] Avoid to talk about NRCFOSS activities, duties and all about its official issues to any one of NRCFOSS member in future. But any one can ask about NRCFOSS progress to our Project co-ordinator. He is ready to answer for you. Hope all you got this mail, http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/pipermail/ilugc/2009-March/046701.html [2] Do not irritate NRCFOSS members at any workshops while we/you organize a workshop in future. [3] After the LUG & nrcofss organized/conducted workshop, please dont say NRCFOSS did nothing. [4] Still you have controversy with NRCFOSS, please arrange a face-to-face discussion and plan according to that. Personally, I am not interested to any type of controversy with any one. I am also stop here. -ASP _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, email ilugc-requ...@ae.iitm.ac.in with "unsubscribe <password> <address>" in the subject or body of the message. http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
