Ok, I've solved my particular problem using token lookaheads, but I was wondering if there is a way of doing non-terminal symbol lookaheads in semantic predicates?
2009/10/6 Naveen Chawla <naveen.c...@googlemail.com> > grammar x; > > x: a b; > > a: 'i' a? | c? 'j'; // Question, how would I write the semantic > predicates: if this "a" is followed by 'v1' choose the first alternative, if > not choose the second alternative > > c: 'i'; > > b: 'v1' | 'v2'; > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-interest@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
