Hi Tim,
At 15:02 06-09-2013, Tim Bray wrote:
How about a BCP saying conforming implementations of a wide-variety
of security-area RFCs MUST be open-source?
A BCP is not needed to do that. It is already doable "but we [1]
know that you [2] are not going to do it".
Speaking of open source,
http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-openssl/openssl/trunk/rand/md_rand.c?rev=141&view=diff&r1=141&r2=140&p1=openssl/trunk/rand/md_rand.c&p2=/openssl/trunk/rand/md_rand.c
*ducks*
Where? I don't see any ducks. :-)
Regards,
-sm
1. The word "we" is used in a general context.
1. The word "you" is used in a general context.
