Newsgroups: iecc.lists.ietf.ietf From: John Levine <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [spfbis] prefixed names, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> Summary: Expires: References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> Sender: Followup-To: Distribution: Organization: Keywords: Cc: Cleverness: some
>The two following MIGHT NOT be in the same zone: > >foo.example. IN X RDATAX >_bar.foo.example. IN TXT RDATAY Since prefixed names have never been used for anything other than providing information about the unprefixed name, what conceivable operational reason could there be to put a zone cut at the prefix? This impresses me as one of those problems where the solution is "don't do that." R's, John
