Newsgroups: iecc.lists.ietf.ietf From: John Levine <jo...@iecc.com> Subject: Re: [spfbis] prefixed names, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> Summary: Expires: References: <5212fcef.80...@dcrocker.net> <55459829-933f-4157-893a-f90552d44...@frobbit.se> <5213174d.7080...@dcrocker.net> <d2148a40-2673-40c7-8349-0a65d0d01...@frobbit.se> Sender: Followup-To: Distribution: Organization: Keywords: Cc: Cleverness: some
>The two following MIGHT NOT be in the same zone: > >foo.example. IN X RDATAX >_bar.foo.example. IN TXT RDATAY Since prefixed names have never been used for anything other than providing information about the unprefixed name, what conceivable operational reason could there be to put a zone cut at the prefix? This impresses me as one of those problems where the solution is "don't do that." R's, John
