My apologies: A typo rendering a sentence incoherent that I missed
before hitting "Send":
On 8/19/13 3:48 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:
* The empirical data that was gathered and the conclusions from which
that where published as RFC 6686 are IMNSHO flawed and rushed in
that they
set far too optimistic deadlines for adaptation before declaring
failure.
I think you're going to need substantially more explanation (and
perhaps some data) to make a convincing case that RFC 6686 needs to be
reconsidered, thereby affecting this last call. The above states a
conclusion, but provides no data or explanation. I don't know how to
evaluation this.
Of course, I meant, "I don't know how to *evaluate* this."
pr
--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
