There are occasions when presentations are appropriate, but they should be the exception rather than the rule or default assumption.
Sent from my iPhone On Jul 31, 2013, at 1:52 PM, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambar...@gmail.com> wrote: > IMHO, The presenters are MUST, but the time channel for presenting is the > problem or boring factor. I mentioned before that we need short presentations > 5 minutes, and more discussions. > > AB > > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Keith Moore <mo...@network-heretics.com> > wrote: >> >> On Jul 30, 2013, at 7:47 PM, Bob Braden wrote: >> >> > On 7/30/2013 9:35 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote: >> >> >> >> Easy fix: 'slide' (well, nobody uses real slides anymore :-) rationing. >> >> >> >> E.g. if a presenter has a 10 minute slot, maximum of 3 'slides' >> >> (approximately; maybe less). That will force the slides to be 'discussion >> >> frameworks', rather than 'detailed overview of the design'. >> >> >> >> Noel >> > >> > Noel, >> > >> > I tried the 3 slide limit in the End2end Research Group some years ago, >> > and it did not work very well. >> > Presenters just can't discipline themselves that much, no matter how hard >> > you beat on them. >> >> Maybe the first step is to stop having "presenters". >> >> Keith >
