On 31/07/2013 05:47, Bob Braden wrote: > On 7/30/2013 9:35 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote: >> >> Easy fix: 'slide' (well, nobody uses real slides anymore :-) rationing. >> >> E.g. if a presenter has a 10 minute slot, maximum of 3 'slides' >> (approximately; maybe less). That will force the slides to be 'discussion >> frameworks', rather than 'detailed overview of the design'. >> >> Noel > > Noel, > > I tried the 3 slide limit in the End2end Research Group some years ago, > and it did not work very well. > Presenters just can't discipline themselves that much, no matter how > hard you beat on them.
It's been pointed out before that in a group with very diverse languages, written words are usually better understood than speech. It's a fact of life that you can't have a full-speed cut-and-thrust discussion in a group of 100 people, half of whom are speaking a foreign language. Sitting in a circle does not fix this. Also, remote participants need full text slides; the soundtrack simply isn't enough. The old days are gone. Brian
