Hi, On Jun 27, 2013, at 18:26, S Moonesamy <sm+i...@elandsys.com> wrote: >> (1) How do you define "remote attendance"? >> >> (2) How does the secretariat determine whether someone has remotely >> attended? (Based on whatever definition of remote attendance you have in >> mind.) > > I prefer not to get into a definition of "remote attendance" for now.
sorry, but it's silly to attempt to propose that remote attendees be permitted to volunteer for NomCom without defining what defines a remote attendee. > For what it is worth the current system only tells us that a person has paid > the registration fee. That person could have gone shopping, fallen asleep > during the WG sessions, or sitting in a corner as he or she does not have a > dot and is not considered as important. The issue you are raising - that limiting the NomCom pool to recent attendees of physical IETF meetings may have downsides - is valid. But at least the requirements the current policy sets are clearly defined. Until you nail down what exactly defines a remote attendee, I can't really form an opinion on whether allowing them into the NomCom pool is a good idea or not. Lars
