> From: John Curran <jcur...@istaff.org>

    > the proposed language also increases the possibility of "capture" (i.e.
    > the ability of an single organization to inappropriately skew the
    > outcome of the process) 

Why not just say directly that 'to prevent "capture", no more than X% of
the NomCom may work for a single organization' (where X is 15% or so, so
that even if a couple collude, they still can't get control).

        Noel

Reply via email to