Ted,
Thanks.
Perhaps then Olafur recommendation:
"must have attended at least 5 meetings of the last 15 and including one of the
last 5".
may be a good compromise. Also, I would suggest "one of the last 6"
(instead of 5). I guess in two years the IETF does not change too much.
Regards,
as
On 6/27/13 12:59 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Jun 27, 2013, at 7:44 AM, Arturo Servin <arturo.ser...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> What is the rationale of the requirement to attend psychically to
>> meetings?
> Acculturation: the opportunity over time to absorb the IETF culture and
> become a part of it. The other points you raised are valid, but this is the
> main thing.
>
> I think acculturation is possible for remote attendees in theory, but not
> with the current level of support for off-site participation—while what we
> have is great for helping people to participate in selected working group
> meetings, it doesn't provide anything like the experience of an on-site
> participant.
