On 2013-05-21, at 12:02, Keith Moore <mo...@network-heretics.com> wrote:
> Actually I think that what we need is a BCP that says that DNS is not > intended, not designed, and SHOULD NOT be used for dissemination of any > information that is not deemed acceptable for widespread public distribution. > Neither the DNS protocol nor DNS implementations are designed to meet the > security requirements of such applications, and DNS is too widely deployed to > change that. I'd be quite happy to work on such a document if there were others keen to contribute, review, etc, but I don't see it as anything specific to the specifications under discussion here. What am I missing? How is EUI48 more dangerous to the world than (say) TXT or NSAP? Joe
