On May 21, 2013, at 8:56 AM, Keith Moore <mo...@network-heretics.com> wrote:
> 2119 language is intended to describe requirements of standards-track > documents. Can you support that statement with a reference to an RFC or an IESG statement that supports it? > Informational documents cannot impose requirements. Same request. I don't find either statement supported by RFC 2119 or 2026, or any updates to the latter, but I may have missed it. --Paul Hoffman
