I must say that I have enjoyed reading the discussion between the three of you, and think it is immensely valuable in explaining what the IESG ought to be doing. You three should write it up.
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF ... Joe Touch
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF ... Ted Lemon
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF ... Joe Touch
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF ... Ted Lemon
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF ... Joe Touch
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF ... Keith Moore
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF ... Pete Resnick
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF ... Keith Moore
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF ... John C Klensin
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF ... Keith Moore
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF ... Ted Lemon
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF ... Ralph Droms
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF ... Joe Touch
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF ... Jari Arkko
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF proce... Keith Moore
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF ... Jari Arkko
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF ... Thomas Narten
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF ... Joe Touch
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process Dave Crocker
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process Stephen Farrell