I believe the five-author limit is not as strict: (see, e.g., RFC6550) Ulrich
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:57 PM, <l.w...@surrey.ac.uk> wrote: > > Actually, as there's already a five-author limit on RFCs, acks are already > subject to guidance... > > Did rfc2223bis expire? Section 2.12 there. > > Lloyd Wood > http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/ > > > ________________________________________ > From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Melinda > Shore [melinda.sh...@gmail.com] > Sent: 25 March 2013 16:20 > To: Scott Brim > Cc: John C Klensin; dcroc...@bbiw.net; ietf > Subject: Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections > > On 3/25/13 8:17 AM, Scott Brim wrote: > > or a statement that acknowledgments is not a required section and not > > subject to IETF guidance. > > Excellent. > > Melinda > > >
