On Jan 10, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Fred Baker wrote: > I'm envisioning the process and requirements of the poster sessions. In terms > of process, today if I post a -00 draft to a working group, I can generally > get discussion during the coming IETF meeting. What I think this suggests is > that instead I would show a poster at the coming meeting and get working > group discussion the meeting following. I'm not sure I like that implication.
Ah, good point. I'd been imagining that the poster time would be for drafts where there isn't already a WG working on 'em, or /maybe/ where the WG (or the author) feels there's a need for wider participation. That's what I'd be excited to peruse, anyhow. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
