You're right, the TCP peak was 1.48Gbps from the show floor in Dallas to a storage cluster at Berkeley Laboratory. Single applications using multiple stream. Bottleneck link was 1.5Gbps provisioned circuit on Qwest link from convention center to DARPA's HSCC pop node. This beat last years (SC'99) 1.2 Gbps rate Microsoft achieved running TTCP on a single PC with 2 Gbit Ethernet cards (Redmond to Portland). Rich From the At 11:21 PM 2/6/01 -0500, Colin Perkins wrote: >--> stanislav shalunov writes: > >Larry Foore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> How often would a single TCP session have allocated to itself an > >> entire gigabit link? > > > >At SC2000 there was an application (non-interlaced HDTV) using > >1.5Gbps. > >Sure, but it wasn't using TCP... > >Colin
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jun'an Gao
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jun'an Gao
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Larry Foore
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Keith Moore
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jon Crowcroft
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Colin Perkins
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jun'an Gao
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Harald Alvestrand
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jun'an Gao
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1) aaron
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Richard Carlson
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) John Stracke
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Bob Braden
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Keith Moore
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Mark Allman
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Kevin Farley
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) John Stracke
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Mahadevan Iyer
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Richard Carlson
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jun'an Gao
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jun'an Gao