--> stanislav shalunov writes: >Larry Foore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> How often would a single TCP session have allocated to itself an >> entire gigabit link? > >At SC2000 there was an application (non-interlaced HDTV) using >1.5Gbps. Sure, but it wasn't using TCP... Colin
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Bernard Aboba
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) stanislav shalunov
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jun'an Gao
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jun'an Gao
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jun'an Gao
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jun'an Gao
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jun'an Gao
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Larry Foore
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Keith Moore
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jon Crowcroft
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Colin Perkins
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jun'an Gao
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Harald Alvestrand
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jun'an Gao
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1) aaron
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Richard Carlson
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) John Stracke
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Bob Braden
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Keith Moore
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Mark Allman
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Kevin Farley