Ted Gavin wrote: > > X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (... > > Don't blame the product - in this case the blame rests firmly upon the > user. I used that product for years and managed to avoid spamming this > or any other list with useless information about my travel schedule. Yes, but why is it almost always that product? Maybe other products are smart enough not to reply if the recipient's address isn't in the headers? -- /=================================================================\ |John Stracke | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own. | |Chief Scientist |================================================| |eCal Corp. |World domination should never be left to chance.| |[EMAIL PROTECTED]| | \=================================================================/
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) Joel Jaeggli
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) Patrik Fältström
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) Jeffrey I. Schiller
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) Sean Doran
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) Tripp Lilley
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) Joel Jaeggli
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) John Stracke
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) Michael Richardson
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) Vernon Schryver
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) Ted Gavin
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) John Stracke
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) John Martin
- Re: guidance (re: social event politeness) Ted Gavin
- RE: guidance (re: social event politeness) Book, Robert