Another common curtesy issue this thread has raised is vacation scripts...
I've recieved 3 dozen or so responses from people on the mailing list who
have automated vacation scripts. Please if you must use a vaction script
on your mail either unsubscribe from the mailing list while you're gone,
use procmail to filter your lists so they don't get caught by your
vacation script, or just don't use vacation...
Judging from the laptop/wireless card density I seriously doubt any of the
people using such a script are actually not reading their email here. and
in any event mailing lists traffice should not generate such a response.
thanks
joelja
On 14 Dec 2000, Sean Doran wrote:
>
> Thanks for the feedback, public and private.
>
> It is pretty clear that we attendees should talk to
> Qualcomm and Cisco about the disorganization of the social
> event. Our individual account team or sales people seem
> like good targets for complaints.
>
> However, wrt queue-jumping, there is a serious qualitative
> difference between what some of us are admitting to
> (innocently not realizing there ws a queue) and what
> happened in the IMAX queue.
>
> What I observed was this: the elevated red cloth strips
> forming the "walls" of the serpentine line to the IMAX
> show seemed to attract a sizable handful of people who
> realized that they can be "ducked under", or indeed,
> dismantled.
>
> I am sad to say that I saw this frequently while I was in
> one or the other corner near the IMAX theatre exit doors.
>
> When some friends and I pointed out to people doing this
> queue-jumping that they were being unfair to everyone else
> (who were suffering from the same disorganization),
> approximately 3/4 of the people in question left the queue
> and rejoined it at the back. Others required firmer
> persuasion, and a few required a threat of exposure on
> this mailing list before un-jumping from the queue.
>
> There were only FOUR people who refused to leave the
> queue. None offered an excuse (such as, I was just
> throwing away some garbage, or getting drinks for my
> friends here). They simply stayed in place, apparently
> not caring that they cut in ahead of hundreds of people
> who followed normal rules most of us learned as children.
>
> Two of these people were wearing their IETF conference badges.
> One was identified by several people nearby, who recognized her.
> One guy not only said "go ahead and name me", he attempted to
> identify himself AS SOMEONE ELSE, by handing over another
> person's business card. To this person: WE KNOW WHO YOU ARE NOW.
>
> I believe at least some of this is unacceptable behaviour
> that cannot be overlooked simply by virtue of general
> disorganization or industry competitiveness, and look for
> guidance about how we should (collectively) police such
> poorly-socialized people, if at all.
>
> Sean.
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joel Jaeggli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Academic User Services [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key Fingerprint: 1DE9 8FCA 51FB 4195 B42A 9C32 A30D 121E
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is clear that the arm of criticism cannot replace the criticism of
arms. Karl Marx -- Introduction to the critique of Hegel's Philosophy of
the right, 1843.
