*> *> I find it odd that, although ISOC is the copyright holder of the RFCs *> (as 2026 states) the ISOC website isn't publishing its own RFCs, *> providing a list of mirrors, or even listing them as publications - at *> least I couldn't find anything under *> http://www.isoc.org/isoc/publications/ *> Lloyd, Does it come as a surprise to you to know that the ISOC has contracted to the RFC Editor to publish RFCs, etc.? So, the ISOC *does* "publish its own RFCs". Bob Braden
- Re: Acronims' ambiquity Greg Hudson
- Re: Acronims' ambiquity Pete Loshin
- Re: Acronims' ambiquity Salvador Vidal
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity bindignavile . srinivas
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity Dawson, Peter D
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity Scott Bradner
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity Dawson, Peter D
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity Pete Loshin
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity Pete Loshin
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity J. Noel Chiappa
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity Bob Braden
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity Bob Braden
- Re: Acronims' ambiquity Matt Crawford
- Re: Acronims' ambiquity Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Acronims' ambiquity Joe Touch
- Re: Acronims' ambiquity Brian E Carpenter
