->-----Original Message----- ->From: Salvador Vidal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ->Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 12:38 PM ->To: salavat ->Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->Subject: Re: Acronims' ambiquity -> ->the owner of the ->information has the right to stop abuse of this, the ->information owner not ->necesary means the author, i.e.: I think that the works and ->discusions at ->IETF are property of IETF, so must follow the rules of IEFT, the IETF's RFC/BCP's etc etc are the property of ISOC. /pd
- Acronims' ambiquity salavat
- Re: Acronims' ambiquity Greg Hudson
- Re: Acronims' ambiquity Pete Loshin
- Re: Acronims' ambiquity Salvador Vidal
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity bindignavile . srinivas
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity Dawson, Peter D
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity Scott Bradner
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity Dawson, Peter D
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity Pete Loshin
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity Pete Loshin
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity J. Noel Chiappa
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity Bob Braden
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity Bob Braden
- Re: Acronims' ambiquity Matt Crawford
- Re: Acronims' ambiquity Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Acronims' ambiquity Joe Touch
