At 8:48 AM -0700 4/25/00, Bill Manning wrote: >and this is different from only carrying the 253 usable /8 prefixes in >IPv4 how? The set of customers who have addresses under a given IPv4 /8 prefix greater than 127 do not all aggregate into a single topological subregion (e.g., a single ISP), and therefore more granular routes must be widely disseminated to make those customers reachable. That's the difference. Steve
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt John Stracke
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Andrew Partan
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Paul Ferguson
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Thomas Narten
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Bill Manning
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Steve Deering
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02... Bill Manning
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complication... Steve Deering
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complic... Bill Manning
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complic... Steve Deering
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02... David R. Conrad
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complication... Steve Deering
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complic... David R. Conrad
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complic... Steve Deering
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt David R. Conrad
- multihoming (was Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complic... Paul Francis