On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 04:32:38PM +0200, Sean Doran wrote: > Therefore, in order to support IPv6 house-network multihoming, so > as to preserve at least these three features of traditional > multihoming, either the current IPv6 addressing architecture's > restrictions on who can be a TLA must be abandoned (so each house > becomes a TLA), or NATs must be used to rewrite house-network > addresses into various PA address ranges supplied by the multiple > providers. Or seperate the end system identifer from the routing goop. This solves lots of problems (while introducing others). [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Partan)
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Joe Touch
- correction Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Sean Doran
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Steve Deering
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt John Stracke
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02... Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Andrew Partan
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Paul Ferguson
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Thomas Narten
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Bill Manning
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02... Steve Deering
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complication... Bill Manning
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complic... Steve Deering
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-com... Bill Manning
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-com... Steve Deering
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complication... David R. Conrad