Masataka Ohta wrote: > > Even if it's not true in the general case, a sufficiently expensive lawyer > > might be able to convince the court that, since the Internet makes location > > irrelevant, the location of the infringement is irrelevant. > > that US patents are applicable even if both servers, clients and network > inbetween are all located outside of US? No, not that; but, if the server is outside the US and the client is inside, then maybe. -- /=================================================================\ |John Stracke | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own. | |Chief Scientist |================================================| |eCal Corp. |"Where's your sense of adventure?" "Hiding under| |[EMAIL PROTECTED]|the bed." | \=================================================================/
- Re: A thought about patents Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: A thought about patents Toerless Eckert
- Re: A thought about patents Henning Schulzrinne
- RE: A thought about patents Brijesh Kumar
- Re: A thought about patents John Stracke
- Re: A thought about patents Jon Crowcroft
- Re: A thought about patents Jon Crowcroft
- Re: A thought about patents Masataka Ohta
- Re: A thought about patents John Stracke
- Re: A thought about patents Masataka Ohta
- Re: A thought about patents John Stracke
- Re: A thought about patents Jon Crowcroft
- Re: A thought about patents Salvador Vidal
- Re: A thought about patents Masataka Ohta
- Re: A thought about patents Vernon Schryver
- RE: A thought about patents Dave Miller
- Re: A thought about patents David L. Nicol
- Re: A thought about patents Doug Royer
- Re: A thought about patents Stewart Bryant
- RE: A thought about patents Michael B. Bellopede
