"Polinsky, Steven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There are not enough Private Addresses to go around. > > I would propose that an additional block of addreses be added to those > designated in RFC1918. That would be a big practical help. It won't help, I'm afraid. Most of the organizations I know of have hardly exhausted network 10 -- they just all decide to start numbering from the bottom. Adding another block of them won't fix the situation. -- Perry Metzger [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "Ask not what your country can force other people to do for you..."
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocation... Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IP network address assignments/alloca... John Stracke
- Re: IP network address assignments/al... Daniel Senie
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocation... Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IP network address assignments/alloca... Daniel Senie
- Re: IP network address assignments/al... John Stracke
- RE: IP network address assignments/al... mark.paton
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Linscheid, Sven
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Polinsky, Steven
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocation... Perry E. Metzger
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Polinsky, Steven
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Jeffrey Altman
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Polinsky, Steven
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocation... Josh Duffek
- RE: IP network address assignments/alloca... Josh Duffek
- RE: IP network address assignments/alloca... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocation... Keith Moore
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Ian King
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocation... Matt Holdrege
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocation... Brian E Carpenter