"Perry E. Metzger" wrote:

> BTW, I fully agree with those who contend that v6 does not solve the
> route agregation problems we have in v4.

In itself, no; but getting people who have old non-aggregatable addresses to
transition to v6 will give them the chance to get aggregatable addresses, won't
it?

--
/==============================================================\
|John Stracke    | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own.|
|Chief Scientist |=============================================|
|eCal Corp.      |"Time is money, and price is information."   |
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|--Russ Nelson                                |
\==============================================================/


Reply via email to