At 15:06 23.11.99 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>Personally, I wouldn't have bothered with the triple-DES telnet
>encryption mode, on the grounds that because it is a very weak mode, it
>doesn't provide much protection.  However, Jeffery lobbied for them on
>the grounds that they were being used in some existing implementations
>(I don't remember which one, but it wasn't Kerberos V5), and that we
>should document what some implementations are using today.
Protocols that offer increased complexity but no gain in security or 
efficiency over other standards-track efforts, but are in use today, are 
IMHO excellent candidates for Informational publication.

Not for the standards track.

                Harald A

--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to