This short document proposes the tag structure for the DKIM2 header and
sketches out some of the other things DKIM2 will do.
It's a reasonable start on the spec and I think we should adopt it.
To the objection that we haven't agreed to use a different header rather
than extending existing DKIM, I would prefer not to ligitate that issue
over and over. Let's design DKIM2 or whatever we call it to do what we
want it to do, and if it then turns out (unlikely in my opinion) that we
can shoehorn it into the existing DKIM, so be it and that's what our RFCs
will say. Or they won't.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org
