It appears that Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> said: >No, it's not so much the interpretation of pass/fail, which I think will be >expressed by policies anyway, but the checks you perform to achieve that >result. DKIM2 checks the envelope, for example, which DKIM1 does not. So >DKIM2 may fail on messages that DKIM1 passes.
I'd say that if DKIM1 passes a signature that is supposed to fail, that is badly broken. So let's stop trying to do that. R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org
