On 4/1/25 11:08 AM, John R. Levine wrote:
On Tue, 1 Apr 2025, Michael Thomas wrote:
Either way it seems like a severe waste of time to do that rather
than make DKIM2 work. I see no chance that DKIM2 or EKIM or
whatever we call it will use the same signature header so it's
purely hypothetical anyway.
What protocol draft are you basing that assumption off of? I haven't
seen one. Until there is one, it's just guesswork.
I'm looking at the goals and notes in Bron's drafts.
Which is to say, guesswork. And an individual submission is not working
group consensus in any case.
Mike
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org
