On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 11:14 AM Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> wrote:
> AKA "layering violation". That's on what is being proposed here, not on > SMTP. Made worse by constricting perfectly valid SMTP behavior. > ...which isn't to say it shouldn't be done, but we have to acknowledge that that's what we're doing, and doing it intentionally, and understanding the implications and added complexity. -MSK, participating
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org
