On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 8:51 AM Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> wrote:
> >> This seems really premature. > > > > Note that we haven't adopted the document yet. We haven't even put out > > the minutes of the face-to-face or put out a call for adoption yet. We > > simply marked the document as a candidate for adoption. Given the > > discussion in the face-to-face. Nothing premature about that. See > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/help/state/draft-stream-ietf/. > > Is it somehow wrong to comment on what went on in the meeting? I wasn't > there. > The discussion in Bangkok, which as with any other discussion has to be confirmed on the list, appeared to agree that the three draft-gondwana-* documents are reasonable starting points for discussion about what this WG will produce. That makes them, quite literally, candidates for adoption. Accordingly, I placed them in that state. That doesn't mean they're adopted, or that a call for adoption (CFA) has been issued. That would be a different state, and there would be a deadline for feedback about that question. However, given the discussion and the need to "take it to the list", I would suggest that the CFA is imminent. It's the next logical step given the consensus in the room. It's fine to think it's premature, and nobody said it's wrong to comment. That can be part of your input to the CFA when it appears, and it's a perfectly valid input to that consensus question. -MSK
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org
