On 3/23/25 5:02 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
No call for adoption (CFA) has been issued. I marked these as
"Candidate for WG Adoption" as a first step in that direction, sort-of
to "claim" them as belonging to this WG and to indicate that a CFA is
imminent. I did this because that was the consensus of the room in
Bangkok, i.e., that these three documents are where the WG appears to
want to start.
Now, in their current state, we've made no such commitment, only
expressed an intent consistent with the consensus in the room. Once
the CFAs are open, we can debate whether we think adoption or any or
all of them would be premature.
All WG business must be confirmed on lists. The CFA discussion will
happen on-list. Those are imminent, as soon as I post some minutes
and catch up on the rest of the discussion.
Fine. Thinking about it, the mutations draft has enough meat on its
bones to be a good candidate, and the motivation draft as well, though
it's really confusing. The header draft might as well be an empty I-D
but I think that Pete(?) thought that was ok too. I personally would
like to see something more fleshed out as a candidate, but I may be in
the minority.
Mike
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org
