On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 3:54 PM Steffen Nurpmeso <stef...@sdaoden.eu> wrote:
> But that DKIM2 draft mutilates SMTP to *only* work in this one > recipient mode: even if a mailing-list has hundreds of Gmail > subscribers, where ACDC would (could) send one message to all of > those in a single transaction, DKIM2 sends hundreds! > The argument has been made that the bulk of Internet mail these days is single recipient anyway, so the load increase this would cause is negligible. Someone who has data to back up that claim could probably help us out here. > ACDC is activated when the receiver announces support. > The DKIM subsignature is created for the mailing-list. > The mailing-list then distributes further, creating normal > signatures and per-receiver-domain subsignatures as necessary. > There is no clash. > For everyone else, Steffen appears to be referring to: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nurpmeso-dkim-access-control-diff-changes/ > One thing is plain: until ACDC or DKIM2 have penetrated the > infrastructure, the current mess of DMARC and ARC will have to be > dealt with! This IETF has forced all those people to implement > this merde, and it likely takes a decade or something until it is > iterated away!! > Huh? The IETF hasn't forced anyone to do anything. -MSK
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org
