I understand that if you can revert the modifications and verify the signature, you can then associate the reputation of the originating domain with the original's canonical text (but you'd have to evaluate the rest in a separate context). Which seems interesting, but are people thinking that there is more to it than that? Like it would potentially drive more deployment of DMARC p=reject? Or is there something else I'm missing?
A priori, I wouldn't think it would really help p=reject for various reasons, but I'd be interested to hear what the motivation is.
Mike _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org
