-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In message <cal0qlwawko7qtc0yj_1sutfr8n6yrhxqpaib20obddj5voz...@mail.gma
il.com>, Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> writes

>    (2) I hope that the latter paragraph isn't meant to suggest that X 
>    people looking at this problem for Y time in some outside closed 
>    forum Z is meant to inoculate the proposed work from alternative 
>    suggestions.  This is an open standards body.

No it's meant to indicate that X people spent Y time looking at this
issue and concluded that DKIMbis was not a way forward -- since those X
were pretty skilled and Y was a fairly long time you might be led to
conclude that a DKIMbis was less likely to be the way forward than if
you had not been given that information ...

... you might also note that the X people are probably not going to
spend many cycles to develop and test a DKIMbis since they have already
concluded it's not going to be capable of solving the problems they
consider to be important to them -- and those problems include code
complexity, latency and energy budgets.

- -- 
richard                                                   Richard Clayton

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary 
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin 11 Nov 1755

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1

iQA/AwUBZ5jpdmHfC/FfW545EQL8OgCeLgYPVPhQqIqwlk1a4od/uC+/KSEAoNeW
l8I1UGS3hOhyh2E/06Fb97iu
=FvX3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to