On 4 Aug 2023, at 11:57, Dave Crocker wrote: > On 8/4/2023 11:51 AM, Jim Fenton wrote: >> I was referring to draft-chuang-replay-resistant-arc-07, not what is >> mentioned in the subject line. It refers to RFC 8617 which is experimental, >> although it lists it as an informative rather than a normative reference >> which I think is incorrect. > > You think there is a problem with having a nascent draft specification refer > to -- or even rely on -- a published, experimental specification? Really? > > I don't recall that being a problem historically nor against any IETF > policies, rules, or the like? Perhaps you can elaborate on your concerns and > the historical basis for them?
The charter calls for a standards-track specification by December. It would seem problematic if it has a normative reference to an experimental specification. But a call for adoption has not been issued yet, so perhaps this is jumping the gun. -Jim _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
