>>> >>>> On 10 Mar 2023, at 00:30, Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> >>>> <mailto:m...@mtcc.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Now that we have a chair, I have a question about process wrt to the >>>> charter. The charter states that either the working group will produce >>>> documents addressing the problem, or it will produce a document saying why >>>> it can't do anything about it within the IETF confines. I strongly suspect >>>> that that the latter will be the conclusion but I don't know what the >>>> process would look like to come to that conclusion. It seems like it >>>> entails a long list of "can't do this"'s etc followed by "we give up". But >>>> that list could be nearly endless if it is allowed to get out of hand. So >>>> what does it take to come to that conclusion from a process standpoint? >>> >>> Our current milestones are: >>> >>> Apr 2023 - Post a consensus problem statement draft to the datatracker (may >>> not go to the IESG) >>> >>> Jun 2023 - Proposal regarding plans for remaining document(s) presented to >>> the AD >>> >>> Dec 2023 - Submit technical specifications for replay-resistant DKIM >>> enhancement(s) to the IESG at Proposed Standard >> >> Per the charter, Or Not. That is what I'm asking about. >> > > Between the milestones and the charter text, the charter text is typically > the more important of the two. Milestones can be edited without full IESG > review, while the charter can't. So if the working group needs more time > than April or June, that can be negotiated.
I’d like to get a problem statement done by April. What I’m seeing is a lot of people focused on solutions or having side discussions about spam filters rather than looking at the wording of the two proposed problem statements we have on the table. > Plus, frankly, I made up those dates during chartering. The chairs and I > haven't discussed whether they're reasonable or whether something else should > be there. If people want to propose adjustments, I'm all ears. I do want to stick with April for the problem statement. It should be a deadline we can meet with a little bit of focus on defining the problem statement. laura > > -MSK, this time with the AD hat on > _______________________________________________ > Ietf-dkim mailing list > Ietf-dkim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim -- The Delivery Experts Laura Atkins Word to the Wise la...@wordtothewise.com Email Delivery Blog: http://wordtothewise.com/blog
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
