Now that we have a chair, I have a question about process wrt to the
charter. The charter states that either the working group will produce
documents addressing the problem, or it will produce a document saying
why it can't do anything about it within the IETF confines. I strongly
suspect that that the latter will be the conclusion but I don't know
what the process would look like to come to that conclusion. It seems
like it entails a long list of "can't do this"'s etc followed by "we
give up". But that list could be nearly endless if it is allowed to get
out of hand. So what does it take to come to that conclusion from a
process standpoint?
Also: if M3AAWG is producing its own BCP can that actually be taken as
an IETF BCP? Wouldn't it need to just be informational since the IETF
community had no input to its making and the deliberation behind it?
Since I'm not a member, it's opaque to me about the reasoning and what
guided the recommendations. Worse is that since there is so much opaque
industry secrecy surrounding this, it's pretty much impossible to test
the recommendations to see if they are correct.
Mike
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list
Ietf-dkim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
