Hello!

On 09/04/2015 01:57 AM, Michael Friedrich wrote:
> Am 03.09.2015 um 20:52 schrieb Dewangga Bachrul Alam:
>> No, I didn't. I just apply SELinux Policy from branch
>> `feature/rpm-selinux-8332`.
>>
>> By default /var/lib/icinga2 file context was
>>
>> $ ls -ldZ /var/lib/icinga2/
>> drwxr-x---. icinga icinga system_u:object_r:var_lib_t:s0  
>> /var/lib/icinga2/
>>
>> Did the policy came from github broke the icinga2 core function if
>> SELinux in enforcing mode ? Should I change this folder back to
>> var_lib_t ?
> 
> To clear things up: You did install the default release packages and
> then manually applied the selinux policy from that branch? (note: the
> most accurate version sits in git master for a while now).

Yes, it is. I install from default release packages, and apply selinux
policy that came up from git. My mistake, should I remove the policy and
set them back to default file context? Any advice?

> 
> What's the exact log line from audit.log when such notification script
> cannot be executed?

That's the problem. There's nothing there when the script(s) can't be
executed. I can't track down the error :(

> 
> Kind regards,
> Michael
> 
> -- 
> Michael Friedrich, DI (FH)
> Senior Developer
> 
> NETWAYS GmbH | Deutschherrnstr. 15-19 | D-90429 Nuernberg
> Tel: +49 911 92885-0 | Fax: +49 911 92885-77
> GF: Julian Hein, Bernd Erk | AG Nuernberg HRB18461
> http://www.netways.de | michael.friedr...@netways.de
> 
> ** OSBConf 2015 - September - osbconf.org **
> ** OSMC 2015 - November - netways.de/osmc **
> _______________________________________________
> icinga-users mailing list
> icinga-users@lists.icinga.org
> https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users
_______________________________________________
icinga-users mailing list
icinga-users@lists.icinga.org
https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users

Reply via email to