Having a SPIE exit doesn't require them to mangle the dump. They do that pour le sport.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of Gord Tomlin <gt.ibm.li...@actionsoftware.com> Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 1:56 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: ESPIE question (does ESPIE "cover" ATTACH'd sub-tasks) On 2020-04-02 11:03, David Crayford wrote: > In that case why does LE use ESPIE in condition handling? An irreverent take would be that they enjoy obfuscating abends by transforming program checks into U4xxx abends. The ESPIE can be eliminated using TRAP=(ON,NOSPIE), and we have not seen any adverse effects upon LE recovery from running that way. -- Regards, Gord Tomlin Action Software International (a division of Mazda Computer Corporation) Tel: (905) 470-7113, Fax: (905) 470-6507 Support: https://secure-web.cisco.com/1bIa5wBBg20RuLBWAzomV6eVKZcIkoQWycYrgdnCR8mBQ4GGfUKutxVeuc4NaxxmNPwdtjOdDWzJVkJqVq5mPYbfZJw8NIibHb_4IbTY_1d6yJ8FKwbDV2zgEVFPF3F4so3CXC44N7ROxcYVBMLgbkoMWWFYeerYLcHGYVOdZURH7CkuOrvdcAie2FlintY_ilGOEHUUSPAg7P4u6PQWA2UtkL93OPKTIGIJr1SLU2ApU1w4etL9i08KN9RV7Mny1nrJFipj7eptoGUZGJUscn758z5YWCIwwKJ25MS7eiwDznRubwTqvLpy04mK5D4cn8QA2vOTSxXnqNE4-KjXIthbyYhd5bMphXrNFwdUGkrqyPdBeszJcPIIzqyWJ-4AjAgETg7mwjJMBaE_ozCwLPUk2dgPhPHyJkD5AeAjRH_NFYm-otdYLcK2VaTBgdNmA/https%3A%2F%2Factionsoftware.com%2Fsupport%2F ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
