Of course dispatching a SPIE exit from the Program SLIH is less  overhead than 
calling ABTERM schedule ABEND, processing the ABEND and dispatching an 
(E)STA(E|I).


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of 
Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 3:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ESPIE question (does ESPIE "cover" ATTACH'd sub-tasks)

As Peter seems to imply, ESPIE interrupts are apparently noticeably lower 
overhead than ESTAE interrupts. If data or addressing exceptions were expected 
I definitely *would* use ESPIE. I would save ESTAE for unexpected (well, 
expected unexpected) conditions. My opinion: no benchmarks, no source code.

Charles


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Gord Tomlin
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 12:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ESPIE question (does ESPIE "cover" ATTACH'd sub-tasks)

On 2020-04-02 14:14, Charles Mills wrote:
> I had the same observation. Sending every condition through the same handler 
> was advantageous for me.

Same here.

>
> You would want to keep the SPIE if program checks were expected: perhaps a 
> report generator where you anticipated that users might declare fields to be 
> packed when they were not always valid.

You can also recover program checks from ESTAE(X).
"You would want" -> "You might want".

--

Regards, Gord Tomlin
Action Software International
(a division of Mazda Computer Corporation)
Tel: (905) 470-7113, Fax: (905) 470-6507
Support: 
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1dQ8bhXNpmvLa4NVcjmC2fB982Tui0X9JlHunCUBPv_aClibXfM6TLhPQP2WT5DcrTnQBpFc0RhGwxsaeDIpogh-Km5NukF3RJomWV60Bm0ZyCEwb8CbrnxZO2x6bpAn2IQV8S6w2Iw9_BBrpXVA80_V-Kt6hkUQbW-W0xsDYQTce0UBQV6ca459Hsl_V_LPlgAdwkyjMV6TMsAVD9lG1uVOfZOUBKoYEW_RzD6u2LObCFzRRPVd1V7Bo_M8SqE9czxV3GfpcwXX_vgio5vhQ03-IITFjOQ2ZFrrL1Hxosb4PreDIA5uDdPSQnVIn6BBvVnYdrAkLPaSRVe5LbKgF-etZhF-b2Cm3Zd42Q_5ZdF0HINGKX-2Tq0VgdbVzQgQ4XlZJ8W6j927m5XSfpo9acR5CpuqNwMDwzqOBUae9IMGvB_SZn9HHL0NGg73ZtFlL/https%3A%2F%2Factionsoftware.com%2Fsupport%2F

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to